‘Koran in elk huis’ als een bedreiging van de veiligheid naar Duitsland
Ik begin de eerste zinvolle post van deze blog met een kruis post van gele sterren op het probleem dat ik heb over bloggen voor ongeveer twee jaar: de behandeling van Europese moslims door de Europese staten. In Duitsland, waar er de afgelopen schaamte over de nationaal-socialistische Underground en de zogenaamde "mislukkingen" van de Duitse inlichtingendienst te zijn, zien we nog een ander voorbeeld van hoe onschuldig en wettelijk beschermde religieuze activiteiten van de lokale moslimgemeenschap worden omgezet in een "nationale bedreiging van de veiligheid. "Terwijl de hele regio's in Duitsland zijn overgenomen en etnisch gezuiverd door neo-nazi's - de 'Koran in elk huis "campagne van een islamitische prediker is te zien in sommige kringen van de Duitse staat als" agressie "en een" nationale bedreiging van de veiligheid." Het probleem is het terrorisme en nationale veiligheid discours in de Duitse staat en de rest van de westerse wereld waar moslims en hun gemeenschappen zijn verdacht gemeenschappen die zijn uitgesloten van de veiligheid discours en zijn "verdachte gemeenschappen" als het gaat om terrorisme.
Categories: "Islamic network" my ass!, "War on terrorism" abuses, Human Rights, Religious freedom, Security, Western society Tags: EU politics, Freedom of expression, Human rights, Islamophobia, Security
German State concern for “A Koran in every home” campaign exposes misguided security concern
A Muslim preacher in Germany wants to give out 25 million Korans. No big deal, you say? Well - it is a B-I-G deal and the making of a "Koran in every home" campaign of a German Muslim preacher into a "national security threat" was actually quite predictable. The "act of aggression" (as the campaign has been called by members of the Angela Merkel's own party) stems from the growing anti-Muslim bias in Western security and intelligence services that label religious and political activities by Muslims as "radicalization" and elevates innocent and legally protected activities to the level of "national security threat." The problem here is the security and terrorism discourse that continues to define innocent activities by Muslims as "threats." Part of this discourse is to turn crimes committed by Muslims into "terrorism" and now "lone wolf jihad." The response, as discussed in spades here, is treat Muslim communities as "suspect communities" and undermine human rights of European Muslims.
Categories: "Islamic network" my ass!, Critical terrorism studies, European values, Freedom and Liberty, Ignored security threats, Islamophobia, Religious freedom Tags:
The French State and its abusive reactions to Toulouse shootings.
Already - we are seeing the "arrests" of "members of an 'Islamist network'" on the part of the French State. We are also seeing the arrest of the gunman's mother. The reality is that these so-called "Islamist networks" could be nothing more that religious study groups that the gunman was associated with...If there was a threat of "terrorism" against the French State, why not act before the violence? Why? The threat from "Islamist networks" is probably non-existent and phony, just as the claims that the gunman was "an al-Qaeda operative." While Sarkozy takes political advantage of this horrible violence - I will likewise take advantage and a I have spent late last night starting a case study on how the French State is now collectively punishing the French Muslim community for the actions on a lone gunman! ~NL - Nu al - we zien de "arrestatie" van "leden van een 'islamitische netwerk'" van de kant van de Franse staat. We zien ook de arrestatie van de moeder van de schutter's. De realiteit is dat deze zogenaamde "islamitische netwerken" zou kunnen zijn niets meer dat religieuze studiegroepen dat de schutter werd geassocieerd met ... Als er een dreiging van "terrorisme" tegen de Franse staat, waarom niet handelen voordat het geweld? Waarom? De dreiging van "islamitische netwerken" is waarschijnlijk niet bestaat en nep, net zoals de vorderingen die de schutter was "een al-Qaeda te werken." Terwijl Sarkozy neemt politiek voordeel van dit verschrikkelijke geweld - wil ik ook gebruik maken en een heb ik doorgebracht gisteravond laat het starten van een case study over de manier waarop de Franse staat wordt nu collectief straffen van de Franse moslimgemeenschap voor de acties op een eenzame schutter!
Categories: "Islamic network" my ass!, "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", Critical terrorism studies, Islam moral panic, Religious freedom, Terrorism my ass! Tags: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", 911-excuse, French shootings, Religious freedom, Sarkozy, threats to freedom
Shootings in France to become “terrorism?!” Of course – only Muslims commit “terrorism!”
One of the abuses that Western governments currently engage in is with the label "terrorism." This latest shooting spree in France - labeled as "terrorism" indicates just how biased and discriminatory the use of this label is. Recent shootings involving non-Muslims are not "terrorism" - because the killers were not Muslims. Was Gianluca Casser a "terrorist" when he shot dead street vendors in Italy last December? Was Tristan van der Vlies a "terrorist" when he shot dead shoppers at Alphen aan den Rijn almost a year ago? Nope - because both were not Muslims. We must put up a wall of vigorous resistance against any and all attempts to turn this "act of terrorism" into justification to demonize and criminalize religious faith and political opinions, as well as push back on the current biased and discriminatory Western counter-terrorism regime.
Categories: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", "War on terrorism" abuses, Critical terrorism studies, European Union, Freedom and Liberty, Religious freedom, Security, Terrorism Tags: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", 911-excuse, France, France shooting, Freedom and Liberty, Human rights, Sarkozy, threats to freedom
Faulty and biased terrorism studies field behind NYPD’s radicalization model
The NYPD’s “radicalization model” and its spying program grew out of the Orthodox terrorism study field that has been viewed in the past of shoddy social science, using labels and anti-Muslim narratives. The Orthodox terrorism study field that gave us the NYPD model is state centric and cares little about human rights, like religious freedom and freedom of expression. This article uses Critical terrorism studies to explain where the NYPD gets its model and the notion of “radicalization.” It is actually “radicalization” and its definitions and uses that emboldened the NYPD to its massive spy program. The use of the NYPD “radicalization model” must be forbidden in liberal democratic societies and the human rights of the public protected from abuses that come from this “radicalization model.”
Categories: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", Critical terrorism studies, Islam moral panic, Religious freedom Tags: Freedom and Liberty, Freedom of expression, Human rights, NYPD, Orthodox terrorism studies, politics in law enforcement, radicalization models, Religious freedom, Security, threats to freedom
Rick Santorum, the American Taliban and Geert Wilders
Rick Santorum's myths about euthanasia in the Netherlands mirror myths about Muslims and Gays from this same ilk of "conservatives." Santorum has been to David Horowitz functions just as Geert Wilders has. Santorum speaks the same way about Muslims that his pro-Wilders friends, confusing all of Islam with "radical Islam." Santorum's opposition of Gay rights is also well known, and if Santorum ever got his way, Gays would be shoved back into the closet! Geert Wilders walks a fine line in the maintaining of support for anti-Muslim, anti-Gay, radicals of the American Taliban and support at home, but then the Dutch people have been left in the total darkness about Wilders' American Taliban friends by the Dutch media. --- NL: Rick Santorum mythes over euthanasie in Nederland spiegel mythes over moslims en homo's uit dezelfde ilk van "conservatieven". Santorum is geweest om David Horowitz functioneert net als Geert Wilders heeft. Santorum spreekt op dezelfde manier over moslims, dat zijn pro-Wilders vrienden, verwarrend allemaal van de islam met "de radicale islam." Santorum de oppositie van de Gay rechten is ook bekend, en als Santorum ooit kreeg zijn zin, homo's zouden worden geschoven terug in de kast! Geert Wilders loopt een fijne lijn in het bijhouden van steun voor anti-islamitische, anti-Gay, radicalen van de Amerikaanse Taliban en ondersteuning thuis, maar toen het Nederlandse volk zijn achtergelaten in de totale duisternis over Wilders 'American Taliban vrienden door de Nederlandse media.
