Ignored security threats

German State concern for “A Koran in every home” campaign exposes misguided security concern

victims1

A Muslim preacher in Germany wants to give out 25 million Korans. No big deal, you say? Well - it is a B-I-G deal and the making of a "Koran in every home" campaign of a German Muslim preacher into a "national security threat" was actually quite predictable. The "act of aggression" (as the campaign has been called by members of the Angela Merkel's own party) stems from the growing anti-Muslim bias in Western security and intelligence services that label religious and political activities by Muslims as "radicalization" and elevates innocent and legally protected activities to the level of "national security threat." The problem here is the security and terrorism discourse that continues to define innocent activities by Muslims as "threats." Part of this discourse is to turn crimes committed by Muslims into "terrorism" and now "lone wolf jihad." The response, as discussed in spades here, is treat Muslim communities as "suspect communities" and undermine human rights of European Muslims.

Read more...

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by eslaporte - April 11, 2012 at 6:50 pm

Categories: "Islamic network" my ass!, Critical terrorism studies, European values, Freedom and Liberty, Ignored security threats, Islamophobia, Religious freedom   Tags:

Schietpartijen in Frankrijk te worden natuurlijk “terrorisme?” – Alleen moslims plegen “terrorisme!”

Een van de misstanden die westerse regeringen op dit moment bezighouden met is met het etiket "terrorisme". Deze nieuwste schieten spree in Frankrijk - bestempeld als "terrorisme" geeft aan hoe bevooroordeeld en discriminerende het gebruik van dit label is. De recente schietpartijen met niet-moslims zijn geen "terrorisme" - omdat de moordenaars waren geen moslims. Was Gianluca casser een "terrorist" als hij dood straatverkopers geschoten in Italië in december vorig jaar? Was Tristan van der Vlies een "terrorist" als hij dood shoppers beschoten Alphen aan den Rijn bijna een jaar geleden? Nope - omdat beide niet waren moslims. We moeten een muur van krachtige verzet tegen alle pogingen om deze "daad van terrorisme" te zetten in de motivering bij het demoniseren en criminaliseren religieuze geloof en politieke opvattingen, maar ook terug te duwen op de huidige vooringenomen en discriminerende westerse strijd tegen het terrorisme regime .

Read more...

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by eslaporte - March 22, 2012 at 6:33 pm

Categories: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", Freedom and Liberty, Ignored security threats, Terrorism   Tags: , , , , , , ,

Meurtres dans la France sont le “terrorisme?” Bien sûr, – les musulmans commettent «terrorisme!”

Un des abus que les gouvernements occidentaux se livrent à l'heure actuelle est avec l'étiquette "terrorisme". Cette frénésie de dernière prise de vue en France - étiquetés comme «terrorisme» indique à quel point partial et discriminatoire à l'utilisation de ce label. Fusillades récentes impliquant des non-musulmans ne sont pas le «terrorisme» - parce que les tueurs ne sont pas musulmans. Gianluca casser était un "terroriste" quand il a tiré les vendeurs de rue morts en Italie Décembre dernier? Tristan van der Vlies était un "terroriste" quand il a tiré les acheteurs morts à Alphen ya presque un an? Non - parce que les deux n'étaient pas des musulmans. Nous devons mettre en place un mur de résistance vigoureuse contre les tentatives quelconques à leur tour cet «acte de terrorisme" dans la justification de diaboliser et contre alize foi religieuse et opinions politiques, ainsi que sur le refoulement partiale et discriminatoire actuelle de l'Ouest lutte contre le terrorisme régime .

Read more...

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by eslaporte - at 5:41 pm

Categories: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", Freedom and Liberty, Ignored security threats, Security, Terrorism   Tags: ,

Europol tegen Anonymous en de echte veiligheid van Europa

Mr. Wainwright think Anonymous hactivists are dangerous to Europe. Nope, they provide with a needed voice!

Europol website opschept over de arrestaties van de beweerde Anonymous hactivists in Spanje. Terwijl de diefstal en de blootstelling van persoonlijke gegevens moeten worden veroordeeld, moet de uitbreiding van de activiteiten van Europol op Anonymous hactivists die niet schade toegebracht aan mensen of servers worden bestreden en de weerstand. Het is mogelijk dat Anonymous hactivists hebben opengesteld een andere vorm van spreken en te proberen om gehoord te worden dat niet het terrorisme en de daadwerkelijke schade aan andere mensen te betrekken. Anonymous hactivists is een noodzaak klep te bekijken in een tijd waarin regeringsleiders niet uit of we een baan en onze basisbehoeften voldaan. Aan het hoofd van dit afval bij Europol is Robert Wainwright, directeur van Europol, die serieus meent dat Anonymous hactivists - zijn een grotere bedreiging dat de radicale recht, aanhangers van de Nationaal Socialistische Ondergrond van Duitsland, het English Defense League en Anders Behring Breivik - dat eigenlijk willen tot daden van geweld te plegen tegen de EU-burgers. Weet ook dat niemand is omgekomen in een Anonymous hactivists aanval, maar veel mensen zijn gekwetst en gedood bij aanvallen door radicale rechts terroristen. Robert Wainwright is ongeveer net zo dom als het wordt als het gaat om echte veiligheid en de politie werken!

Read more...

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by eslaporte - March 18, 2012 at 12:39 pm

Categories: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", Criminal justice or injustice, European Union, EUROPOL, Ignored security threats, Security   Tags: , , , , , , ,

Europol against Anonymous and the real security of Europe

anno

Europol's website brags about the arrests of claimed Anonymous hactivists in Spain. While the theft and exposure of personal information should be condemned, the expansion of Europol's activities to Anonymous hactivists that have not caused harm to people or servers must be opposed and resisted. It is possible that Anonymous hactivists have opened up another form of speaking and trying to be heard that does not involve terrorism and actual harm to other people. Anonymous hactivists are a need check valve in an age where governmental leaders don't care if we have jobs and our basic needs met. At the head of this rubbish at Europol is Robert Wainwright, Europol Director, who seriously believes that Anonymous hactivists - are a greater threat that the radical right, supporters of Germany’s National Socialist Underground, the English Defense League and Anders Behring Breivik - that actually want to commit acts of violence against EU citizens. Also know that nobody has been killed in an Anonymous hactivists attack, but many people have been hurt and killed in attacks by radical right terrorists. Robert Wainwright is about as dumb as it gets when it comes to real security and police work!

Read more...

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by eslaporte - March 17, 2012 at 4:38 pm

Categories: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", counterjihad terrorism, Criminal justice or injustice, European Union, Ignored security threats, Security   Tags: , , , , ,

What is the radical right terrorist threat against the Netherlands? Here’s how we know…

This study framework will help answer that question where the Dutch counter-terrorism apparatus is either unwilling or unable to provide an answer. For its appearances, both the AIVD and NCTb appear to act with indifference to attacks against Dutch Muslim allochtonen mosques and community centers. The latest “threats against the Netherlands” are the sharia4Holland (which has no support among Muslims) and asylum seeker advocate groups composed of mainly pacifists!. The Dutch counter-terrorism apparatus is too fixated on “Islamists and jihadists” and have a different framework (and a rather one discriminatory against Muslims) to be capable of detecting right wing terrorism, like that discovered in Germany in early November. In many respects, the climate appears like that of Germany for the National Socialist Underground with regard an intelligence and security apparatus that is too fixated on Muslims and asylum seeker advocate groups – and makes the Dutch counter-terrorism apparatus openly discriminatory and utterly useless for the detection of any right wing terrorist threat against the Netherlands. This study framework is an honest start toward an honest assessment that you can expect to be posted here on Yellow Stars in the new year.

Read more...

1 comment - What do you think?  Posted by eslaporte - December 19, 2011 at 7:12 pm

Categories: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", Dutch Political Correctness, Ignored security threats, Netherlands, Right-wing radicalism   Tags:

Next Page »