Shootings in France to become “terrorism?!” Of course – only Muslims commit “terrorism!”
One of the abuses that Western governments currently engage in is with the label "terrorism." This latest shooting spree in France - labeled as "terrorism" indicates just how biased and discriminatory the use of this label is. Recent shootings involving non-Muslims are not "terrorism" - because the killers were not Muslims. Was Gianluca Casser a "terrorist" when he shot dead street vendors in Italy last December? Was Tristan van der Vlies a "terrorist" when he shot dead shoppers at Alphen aan den Rijn almost a year ago? Nope - because both were not Muslims. We must put up a wall of vigorous resistance against any and all attempts to turn this "act of terrorism" into justification to demonize and criminalize religious faith and political opinions, as well as push back on the current biased and discriminatory Western counter-terrorism regime.
Categories: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", "War on terrorism" abuses, Critical terrorism studies, European Union, Freedom and Liberty, Religious freedom, Security, Terrorism Tags: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", 911-excuse, France, France shooting, Freedom and Liberty, Human rights, Sarkozy, threats to freedom
Europol tegen Anonymous en de echte veiligheid van Europa
Europol website opschept over de arrestaties van de beweerde Anonymous hactivists in Spanje. Terwijl de diefstal en de blootstelling van persoonlijke gegevens moeten worden veroordeeld, moet de uitbreiding van de activiteiten van Europol op Anonymous hactivists die niet schade toegebracht aan mensen of servers worden bestreden en de weerstand. Het is mogelijk dat Anonymous hactivists hebben opengesteld een andere vorm van spreken en te proberen om gehoord te worden dat niet het terrorisme en de daadwerkelijke schade aan andere mensen te betrekken. Anonymous hactivists is een noodzaak klep te bekijken in een tijd waarin regeringsleiders niet uit of we een baan en onze basisbehoeften voldaan. Aan het hoofd van dit afval bij Europol is Robert Wainwright, directeur van Europol, die serieus meent dat Anonymous hactivists - zijn een grotere bedreiging dat de radicale recht, aanhangers van de Nationaal Socialistische Ondergrond van Duitsland, het English Defense League en Anders Behring Breivik - dat eigenlijk willen tot daden van geweld te plegen tegen de EU-burgers. Weet ook dat niemand is omgekomen in een Anonymous hactivists aanval, maar veel mensen zijn gekwetst en gedood bij aanvallen door radicale rechts terroristen. Robert Wainwright is ongeveer net zo dom als het wordt als het gaat om echte veiligheid en de politie werken!
Categories: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", Criminal justice or injustice, European Union, EUROPOL, Ignored security threats, Security Tags: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", Anonymous, EU politics, Europol, Occupy Movement, politics in law enforcement, Right-wing radicalism, Security
Europol against Anonymous and the real security of Europe
Europol's website brags about the arrests of claimed Anonymous hactivists in Spain. While the theft and exposure of personal information should be condemned, the expansion of Europol's activities to Anonymous hactivists that have not caused harm to people or servers must be opposed and resisted. It is possible that Anonymous hactivists have opened up another form of speaking and trying to be heard that does not involve terrorism and actual harm to other people. Anonymous hactivists are a need check valve in an age where governmental leaders don't care if we have jobs and our basic needs met. At the head of this rubbish at Europol is Robert Wainwright, Europol Director, who seriously believes that Anonymous hactivists - are a greater threat that the radical right, supporters of Germany’s National Socialist Underground, the English Defense League and Anders Behring Breivik - that actually want to commit acts of violence against EU citizens. Also know that nobody has been killed in an Anonymous hactivists attack, but many people have been hurt and killed in attacks by radical right terrorists. Robert Wainwright is about as dumb as it gets when it comes to real security and police work!
Categories: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", counterjihad terrorism, Criminal justice or injustice, European Union, Ignored security threats, Security Tags: Anonymous, EU politics, European Union, Europol, politics in law enforcement, Robert Wainwright
Part Two: Volkskrant and it’s shameless “standing for (Dutch misconceived) free expression”
Volkskrant, (a former Catholic pillar newspaper that is pro-Wilders) shows no shame or fear of stigma for itself or its advertisers when it chose to run the PVV’s “Polish immigrant hotline” advertisements. Rather than shame and stigma for itself and its advertisers, the editors of Volkskrant are likely to pat themselves on the back as“free speech heroes.” However, “free speech protection” is actually in relation to individuals, groups and governments, not between private persons and groups. Here is where the Fortuynian conception of “free speech respect” is all wrong! For example, calling on boycotts of Volkskrant’s advertisers is not “anti-free speech,” but the right of free speech on the part of those calling for a boycott. Persons and groups have the right of free speech to call on others to not buy products advertised on Volkskrant’s website or newspaper. It is also the free speech right of persons and groups to call Volkskrant (rightfully in my view) a “pro-Wilders, xenophobic, hate-mongering newspaper that probably has Nazis as readers.” --- Volkskrant, (een voormalige katholieke zuil krant die is pro-Wilders) toont geen schaamte of uit angst voor stigmatisering voor zichzelf of haar adverteerders als het ervoor gekozen om de PVV de "Poolse immigrant hotline" reclame uit te voeren. In plaats van schaamte en stigma voor zichzelf en haar adverteerders, de redactie van Volkskrant waarschijnlijk zelf schouderklopje geven als "vrijheid van meningsuiting helden." Maar, "vrijheid van meningsuiting bescherming" is eigenlijk in relatie tot individuen, groepen en overheden, niet tussen particulieren en groepen. Hier is waar de Fortuynian opvatting van 'vrijheid van meningsuiting respect "is helemaal verkeerd! Bijvoorbeeld, een beroep op boycot van de Volkskrant van de adverteerders is niet "anti-vrijheid van meningsuiting", maar het recht van vrije meningsuiting van de kant van degenen die voor een boycot. Personen en groepen het recht van vrije meningsuiting een beroep doen op anderen om niet te kopen producten geadverteerd op de website van Volkskrant of krant. Het is ook de vrijheid van meningsuiting recht van personen en groepen Volkskrant (terecht in mijn ogen) een oproep tot "pro-Wilders, xenofobe, haatdragend krant dat heeft waarschijnlijk nazi's als lezers."
Categories: Dutch Political Correctness, Dutch xenophobia, EU Member States, European politics, European Union, International system, Netherlands, Right-wing radicalism Tags: Boycott, East Europeans, Freedom and Liberty, Freedom of expression, Netherlands, Right-wing radicalism, Volkskrant, vrije meningsuiting
Germany could be a lesson for other European nations
We have again that problem of Nazis in Germany. The presence of Nazis in Germany says nothing about Germany and leaving behind its Nazi past. Germany, unlike the Netherlands, has laws and policies in place to deal with radicalized Nazi terrorists and must be called to protect its constitutional and democratic order by banning "political parties" that are a threat. Germany has the responsibility to protect minority communities from terrorism and must place this responsibility along side of protecting its constructional order from Nazis and anti-Muslim extremists. Other European nations should start protecting its minority communities from both radical right terrorists and dangerous political parties.
Categories: "Politically Incorrect Counter-Terrorism", Dutch xenophobia, Elections, European politics, European Union, European values, Geert Wilders, Ignored security threats, Islamophobia, Netherlands, Right-wing radicalism, Terrorism Tags:
Young Arab democracies need European Union help
The religious violence in the young Egyptian democracy is a sign that there is work that especially the European Union needs to undertake. The work should be a teaching moment for Egypt, not a chance by those (Uri Rosenthal) to promote Islamophobia, "clash of civilizations" foreign policy - and exclusive human rights activism that cares only for religious minorities and conveniently forgets the human rights of Muslims. What the EU is capable of doing is leaving group blame of all 1.5 billion Muslims, while working with young Arab democracies, like Egypt. The EU knows how to leave out the Islamophobia and "clash of civilizations" where Member States like the Netherlands cannot envision a rational foreign and human rights policy without Islamophobia. Only the European Union can help young Arab democracies and only the European Union should lead the way!
