Future response to the “Sharia: The Threat to America” rubbish planned
First, the shariah adherents who comprise the supremacist camp constitute a mainstream and dynamic movement in Islam. Importantly, that characterization does not speak to the question of whether this camp is or is not representative of the “true Islam.” There are over a billion Muslims in the world, and their understandings about their belief-system, as well as their practices with respect to it, vary. In light of this, there may not be a single “true Islam.” If there is one, we do not presume to pronounce what it holds.
Generally, this report engages in the same “well not all Muslims,” but then uses generalizations that lend to demonization of all Muslims. There is the usual use of single cases to liken all Muslims as mass shooters or airliner bombers, with little connections to the vast ways Shariah is practiced today.This report also leads itself wide open for attack on the use of the Islamisation/Islamification and “Eurabia” myths, both of are related and both can be proven to be false. Through out this entire document, there appears to be the building of justification to limited the religious, political and social freedoms of American Muslims. The are a lot of Wildersisms (Geert Wilders’ ideology) that promote the notion is “Islam is an ideology” and that limiting the freedoms and liberties enjoyed by Muslims is “defending freedom.” These ideas are, in fact, anti-freedom and anti-human rights, and will result in the loss of basic freedom, perhaps social exclusion and violence, for millions of Muslims and perhaps people who are of the political left.This report is what I have been telling many folks out there. There is increasing radical Islamophobia in Western security studies, and for the sake of our freedom we must vigorously oppose this type of ideology. The reality is that this “Team B’ are the most dangerous lot to come down the pipe since the National Socialists of Germany.Daniel Luban’s article at Islamophobia Today is titled “Top Conservatives Support anti-Muslim Inquisition” – and, as with PVV policies and the Swiss minaret ban – theses security policy proposals are a grave threat to our freedoms and use the mythology of Eurabia as justification. What the authors of “Shariah: The Threat to America” is to further actions against all Muslim nation, no matter how democratic they are, like Morocco and Turkey, and to demonize and oppress Muslims at home.Right now – the threat imposed by Geert Wilders and the threat that this ilk imposes over freedom and democracy in the Netherlands is of prime importance right now in my work. Defense of the Netherlands from this ilk is of prime importance. We must all work to alert the world of what is happening in the Netherlands. I am just about finished with my first publication that will be mailed to US Congress and national embassies in the Netherlands, among some of those on my mailing list. A full research report will be out, and this letter is based upon that yet-to-be released report.Cross-posted to the Stop Wilders site…


If you found out this lunacy was funded by foreign defense contractors, oil magnates, and russian israeli mafia, would you judge it differentlY?EASTERN PROMISES 2: Gaffnery Director a Registered Agent of what foreign body politic?http://shariahtheway.wordpress.com/2010/09/21/eastern-promises-2-gaffnery-director-a-registered-agent-of-what-foreign-body-politic/
[Translate]
I am in agreement with the previous comment. Why is the first response to silence him! I am sure the 3 judges are competent enough, together with the witnesses, to give this highly challenging viewpoint the rigorous scrutiny it deserves. Wilders has asked that the judges give him the opportunity to establish the truth of his thesis. And if he does so, then your political pressure is entirely seditious and self-serving.The correct course would be to understand thoroughly the arguments, and how the muslim immigrant community can proactively adapt to this, to ensure the most harmonious conclusion is reached.Back on the silencing point, i think it is all the more imperative he has the right to speak, as a FATWA calling for beheading was issued by an Australian Imam. How ironic that the dutch government should be trying him for “hate” speech against Islam – and one of Islam’s representatives is calling for his beheading. I can only imagine this has played right into the public perceptions of Islam as a threat to our way of life, no matter how finely expressed the moderate viewpoints of the majority are, until the militant violent international network is somehow expunged or disowned, Islam will include these parts within it.It is no good saying it is a warped interpretation of Islam, because the Haddiths do certainly allow critics of islam to be executed, both muslim and non-muslim. This is, of course, contrary to all legal frameworks outside of Islamic nation states and is precisely the “control from afar” and intimidation which elevates Islam from a mere challenge in cultural difference to a grave long-term threat on a par with fascism and communism (i.e. competing totaletarian ideologies with pattern of rules and regulations to organize all aspects of society).The more the muslim community tries to silence this man, the stronger his message will grow. If the NL judges rule against him, it will be like a death knell for Europe, and the next stage will be riots i imagine.
[Translate]
One cannot yell “fire” in a crowded theater when there is NO fire.First of all, there is NO “islamisation” of the Netherlands occurring and it’s a myth. For one, more immigrants in 2008 came to the Netherlands from other European countries – not Muslim nations. So, the forecast of a “tsunami of Muslisms” is wrong. http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/themas/bevolking/cijfers/extra/mappingworld-1.htmSince “islamisation” is a myth and not occurring, it could certainly be criminal to use a myth and hoax to prosecute, but that depends upon the laws and legal theories in use the Netherlands. It was found to be correct by the European Human Rights court to prosecute Le Pen in France because the facts about the local Muslim community can be known, and the local Muslim community is not a threat to France or the French way of life.I have presented plenty of evidence that Islamisation/Islamification is a myth and there is NO “Eurabia” coming. I have just finished a 12-page letter that I will be mailing out this weekend to American and foreign government officials, especially in the Netherlands – and first to diplomatic representation of governments in the Netherlands, largely in the Hague, and their foreign ministries. It is clear that to expose this horrible myth active methods are required, not just Internet blogs. I will also be traveling to the Netherlands next summer.http://freedom.yellow-stars.com/islam.europe.NL.htm
[Translate]
Sharia law is already active in the United kingdom since 2008:http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article4749183.ece
[Translate]
And who is tell you – personally – that you have to submit to it?The notion that Sharia law is a threat is rubbish – its a religious law code like the cannon law of the Catholic church. In the Netherlands its practiced mainly in conflict resolution and in the personal life of the believer. Sharia law is just for Muslims and not for non-believers.In the US no religious code or belief cannot be forced on anybody and US constitutional law is an established fact. Sharia law cannot and is not being forced. I live about 1K from an Islamic community center that has been there since the 1980s and its a good bet that some forms of Sharia law are being practiced there since its opening.http://yellow-stars.com/blog2/2010/05/10/
[Translate]
Muslims demand that their adoptive countries change to respect Islam- why should patriots of those countries not challenge them and defend the existing cultures? There is a point at which philosophy ends and actions begin. “eslaporte” does not care to recognize that Muslims in general have a very different view of personal freedom and liberty than that of Western societies. Westerners who defend Islam or tout the “leave them alone, they’re harmless” mindset are the ones who reject reality. Show us one video of a Westerner beheading a Muslim because he (or she) is Muslim and you will have credence for your short-sighted defense of this backwards culture. Change is coming to where you live, and it is change for the worse. You don’t have to submit to Sharia law now, but when Muslims gain control of your countries’ legislatures, you will. You may yet live to see your granddaughters denied the right to education and/or stoned to death for being raped. There is a culture war happening right now, and if Islam wins, there will be a second Dark Age in the history of humanity.
[Translate]
Which “Muslims” and in What countries are “they” “demanding respect?” All religions should be respected, as is required in a free society with religious freedom- and there should be NO government interference between a religious leader and his following. If “Muslims” want to practice Sharia law in their religious organizations like Catholic canon law, the government has no business interfering! Also – what is a “patriot” and can’t Muslims be patriots? In the Netherlands, the police and military recruit from the Moroccan communities. In the Netherlands, there is NO reason why a Dutchman cannot be both Muslim and Dutch. The notion that “no Dutchman can be a Muslim” goes against Dutch religious pillar history and culture.You also generalize about Sharia law, using the most harsh forms of the Taliban and parts of Africa. These is harsh forms, which are not wanted or desired among Muslims living in Western countries, including the Netherlands. In May of this year, the Dutch government released a study indicating that Dutch Muslims see existing Dutch law as good enough for them and practice Sharia in relation to conflict resolution. The notion that “Muslims” as some massive subhuman force that wants to take over the West (though birthrates and immigration) and Sharia law are hateful myths with little or no foundation in reality. http://yellow-stars.com/blog2/2010/05/10/no-sharia-law-courts-in-the-netherlands/Yes “they” are quite harmless (“they” are also human beings that respond to socialization of the cultures “they” live in) – and these are facts borne out by demographic, survey and social scientific research, not dehumanizing and hateful myths about “them.”
[Translate]